Depending on where you live, the Ryzen 5 3500X is most likely being sold and advertised to OEMs and system integrators if you haven’t heard of it yet. It was originally described as an OEM-only component for the Chinese market but later shown up in other countries including India.
It turns out that you can buy the 3500X pretty much anyplace however the terms will change depending on where you are. In this article we will be reviewing this budget CPU from AMD and see if it holds against its competitors.
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X Specification
Launched in September 2019, the AMD Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop CPU with six cores. It belongs to the Ryzen 5 family and is compatible with Socket AM4 and the Zen 2 (Matisse) architecture. The Ryzen 5 3500X features 32MB of L3 cache and runs at 3.6 GHz by default, but depending on the workload, it can boost to 4.1 GHz.
Using 3,800 million transistors and a 7 nm fabrication node, AMD is producing the Ryzen 5 3500X. The unlocked multiplier on the Ryzen 5 3500X is fully adjustable, making it much easier to tune in any overclocking frequency.
The Ryzen 5 3500X draws standard power levels for a recent Desktop with a TDP of 65 W. The DDR4 memory is supported by the AMD processor’s dual-channel interface. The maximum memory speed officially supported is 3200 MHz. However you can overclock your computer to go even faster with the correct memory modules.
It supports hardware virtualization, which significantly boosts virtual machine performance. This processor can run programs that use Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX), which improves speed for applications that require a lot of calculations.
More Details about Ryzen 5 3500X Configuration and Competition
With its six cores, the AMD Ryzen 5 3500X competes with the Intel Core i5-9400F on a core-for-core and thread-for-thread basis. The i5-9400F runs at a basic speed of 2.9 GHz. The Ryzen 5 3500X, however, has a base frequency that is higher at 3.6 GHz. In threaded workloads, this might help balance Intel’s per-core advantage, and both CPUs have a 4.1 GHz boost clock.
With support for the PCIe 4.0 interface, which offers twice the I/O speed of the PCIe 3.0 interface offered on Intel’s chips, the AMD Ryzen 5 3500X has all the extras we’ve come to expect from the Ryzen 3000 line of processors. The processor has the same 65W TDP as the Core i5-9400F, but because of how the two companies define the value, these numbers aren’t essentially equal.
Performance and Benchmarks
The Cinebench R20 multi-core results come first, and the 3500X performs poorly here. Yes, it is still quicker than the Core i5-9400F, but it is also slower than the Ryzen 5 1600X from the first generation. Compared to the R5 2600, it is 6% slower, and the R5 3600, it is a shocking 27% slower.
The Ryzen 5 3500X offers an advantage over first- and second-generation Ryzen parts (1600 and 2600 are 6-core/12-thread processors, respectively), thanks to the Zen 2 cores’ superior single core performance.
Because AMD’s SMT approach for the first and second generations of Ryzen wasn’t very effective for compression. The 3500X can compete with the 1600 and 2600 series processors. However, it still performs 22% worse than the R5 3600, which is a sizable performance decline.
Blender test shows the similar results; the 3500X was noticeably slower than the R5 2600 and R5 3600, taking 14% longer to finish the workload than a Ryzen 5 1600 from the first generation.
This indicates that the 3500X is 27% weaker than the R5 1600 and 43% slower than the R5 2600, as it can only match the Core i5-9400F in this situation. We’re looking about a 60% rise in render time when it comes to the R5 3600, so budget-conscious producers would be much best suited with a Ryzen 2600 or comparable.
Gaming Performance and Benchmarks
Now, for gaming benchmarks we’ll start with Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey at 1080p with the extremely high quality settings. As a note, we’re testing using a top-tier RTX 2080 Ti.
We have compared 3500X with i5 9400F because of comparable specs. Performance is fine, so to speak, but we have a slight feeling that 6-thread processors like the 3500X and 9400F will soon follow in the footsteps of the Core i5-7600K.
Battlefield V is a case of a game where 6 or even 8 threads are no longer enough. The Core i7-7700K and Core i5-9400F performed similarly to the 3500X in this instance. While the average frame rate appears to be fairly strong, the 1% low performance is what hurts.
The game is still highly enjoyable and performs far better than on a quad-core 7600K. You may notice notably larger frame drops when compared to CPUs with 12 threads and higher performance.
The R5 1600 and R5 2600 both increased the 1% low performance by 11% and 14%, respectively. The R5 3600, on the other hand, really kicks things up, increasing 1% low performance by about 30%. The 3500X does very well because Shadow of the Tomb Raider is really not quite as CPU-intensive. It only matches the 2600X and 9400F, but altogether, it’s an excellent performance.
Far Cry New Dawn is the least CPU intensive game we’ve played so far, so it’s not surprise that the 3500X doesn’t suffer from bad 1% low performance here; in fact, it performs somewhat better than the 3600. Overall performance was comparable to and not much greater than the 2nd-generation Ryzen.
Is It Worth to Purchase Ryzen 5 3500X?
The 3500X might or might not be worthwhile depending on first- and particularly second-gen Ryzen prices in your area. The R5 2600 is clearly a better option for productivity tasks. Since it beat the 3500X in every core-intensive task we tested.
Conclusion
The AMD Ryzen 5 3500X is a mid-range Desktop CPU. It was launched in 2019 and has six cores and six threads. With a base clock of 3.6GHz, a maximum speed of 4.1GHz, and a power rating of 65W. The Ryzen 5 3500X is part of the Ryzen 5 series and is built on the Matisse 7nm architecture. Read this article if you want to know more about its specification, benchmarks and drawbacks.
Read Also : Which CPU is Best for Day Trading Computers
